Skip to main content

Genocide: "Genocide" Taboo Why We're Afraid of the G-Word

          Alice Hu, in her article “ 'Genocide' Taboo Why We're Afraid of the G-Word ” published in the magazine Harvard International Review on Summer 2016, discusses the United Nations definition and origin of the word “genocide” and how it is different than simply mass violence. And she also hope the International law helps protect people from genocide.
          The author first talk about the term genocide is based on Greek prefix for “race” and the Latin suffix for “killing”.  It was first used by Raphael Lemkin in 1944.  Hu said that in Raphael’s view, genocide is “a premeditated crime with clearly defined goals, rather than just an aberration.”  Raphael told this view to the new formed United Nations in 1948 and made the first genocide international law and to prevent and punish when someone or some government does genocide. Since then genocide has been discussed many times.  Hu mentions the Rwandans, Mayans in Guatemala, the Bosnian Muslims in Bosnia, Darfur in the Sudan, and the Armenians in Turkey.  Those four cases, only Darfur did the United Nations check out and tell the events were genocide.  This happened because the American Secretary of State, Colin Powell.  Hu said, “In face of widespread resistance to labeling the Darfur case a genocide, Powell’s decision to use the “G-word” in 2004 before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee became monumental.”  The end of article, Hu explains why the strong resistance continues and it is big responsibility in the world. Hu also wish people more understanding about “the Stain called Genocide”, more doing and more changing…….
Lebanese of Armenian descent commemorate the 100th Anniversary
of the Armenian Genocide. Turkey, the sucessor state to the Ottoman
EmPire,refuses to acknowledge the mass killings as a genocide.
          In this whole article, Hu does not talk about genocide and impact on the victims with no action by the United Nations. It is very difficult to say something is genocide because there must have enough evidence. It would be dumb to call genocide by only listening to someone else's description. I think any war or event has specific historical background and original reasons. We must find its original reason, then the problem could be solved. But any type genocide brings cultural shame and It is a long term harm to people spiritually. it is sad that people don't know that, When they celebrate their success, they forget everything ( see right photo ).  It was painful when I read this article, what can I do? I only can wish that the world will happen with less genocide and more peaceful.
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownMarch 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM

    I never knew how bad Genocide was until i read your blog. everyone has a responsibility to help end this abuse.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Native American Boarding School: DESTROYING a Culture

Bickford-Duane, Pauline , in his article “ DESTROYING a Culture ” published in the magazine Cobblestone on Jan 2015, discusses about how US Government took land and broke treaties with Native Americans.  Then they tried to make them like white people, But later US Government learned that was a bad idea.  So, they gave Native Americans back a lot of rights such as the ability to governed themselves, attend their own schools, and learn their language. Photographs from the Carlisle Indian School show a group of Sioux boys shortly after their arrival at the school (ABOVE) and a group of “assimilated” Sioux students (OPPOSITE). The author first wrote a short history of how the United States government tried to take over Native American culture. She said the government had tried for almost 100 years and over 400 agreements to find a “solution” to the Native American “problem”. But most of them were not successful. then in the late 1800s, Senator Dawes proposed a solution. Th
1 comment
Read more

China’s One-Child Policy: A Solution or a Problem

            Susan Scutti, in her article “ One Child Policy is One Big Problem for China ” published in Newsweek Global on January 24, 2014, discusses the thirty-five years of China’s official policy regarding of female infanticide and the primary reason for the government making this law.   From 1949 to 1979, the year this law was started, China’s population grew from 542 million to 975 million.   With an increase in birth rates the government was concerned there would be insufficient resources if its population continued to increase.               China has a long-standing cultural bias against females.   Males are expected to take care of elderly parents so parents desire male babies.   There are stories of parents killing female babies. Even in 2005 the government continued this official anti-female bias by associating female babies with disabled babies as a reason to allow a second child.   According to Scutti, “This pairing of ‘girl’ and ‘disabled’ is hardly an accident.  
Post a Comment
Read more

My American dream

Life can be very difficult, education gives hope my life will be better, education can help a person through the hard times. Sometimes the most worthwhile things in life can take a long time and can be very hard to find in the end. But, Education can make a difference in life. I was born in an education family where both my parents were teachers in China.   When my sisters and I were lazy about school, they always told us that we are lucky to enjoy a good education. My parents grew up in the early days of a new China. In the 1960s, there was a movement in China called "the Cultural Revolution," which is about the educated urban youth going to work in the countryside or mountain areas. They thought that labor was a greater honor than education, so during those hard years schools were closed. A ll the young students responded to the party's call to work in rural areas. The slogan, "the most glorious work," encouraged people in the cities to work in rural area
Post a Comment
Read more